首页> 外文OA文献 >Evidence for Different Contributions of Archaea and Bacteria to the Ammonia-Oxidizing Potential of Diverse Oregon Soils▿
【2h】

Evidence for Different Contributions of Archaea and Bacteria to the Ammonia-Oxidizing Potential of Diverse Oregon Soils▿

机译:古细菌和细菌对俄勒冈州土壤氨氧化潜力的不同贡献的证据▿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A method was developed to determine the contributions of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) to the nitrification potentials (NPs) of soils taken from forest, pasture, cropped, and fallowed (19 years) lands. Soil slurries were exposed to acetylene to irreversibly inactivate ammonia monooxygenase, and upon the removal of acetylene, the recovery of nitrification potential (RNP) was monitored in the presence and absence of bacterial or eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitors. For unknown reasons, and despite measureable NPs, RNP did not occur consistently in forest soil samples; however, pasture, cropped, and fallowed soil RNPs commenced after lags that ranged from 12 to 30 h after acetylene removal. Cropped soil RNP was completely prevented by the bacterial protein synthesis inhibitor kanamycin (800 μg/ml), whereas a combination of kanamycin plus gentamicin (800 μg/ml each) only partially prevented the RNP (60%) of fallowed soils. Pasture soil RNP was completely insensitive to either kanamycin, gentamicin, or a combination of the two. Unlike cropped soil, pasture and fallowed soil RNPs occurred at both 30°C and 40°C and without supplemental NH4+ (≤10 μM NH4+ in solution), and pasture soil RNP demonstrated ∼50% insensitivity to 100 μM allyl thiourea (ATU). In addition, fallowed and pasture soil RNPs were insensitive to the fungal inhibitors nystatin and azoxystrobin. This combination of properties suggests that neither fungi nor AOB contributed to pasture soil RNP and that AOA were responsible for the RNP of the pasture soils. Both AOA and AOB may contribute to RNP in fallowed soil, while RNP in cropped soils was dominated by AOB.
机译:开发了一种方法来确定氨氧化古细菌(AOA)和氨氧化细菌(AOB)对森林,牧场,农作物和休耕地(19年)土地土壤硝化潜力(NPs)的贡献。将土壤淤浆暴露于乙炔中以不可逆地灭活氨单加氧酶,并在除去乙炔后,在存在或不存在细菌或真核蛋白质合成抑制剂的情况下,监测硝化潜力(RNP)的回收。由于未知原因,尽管NPs可以测量,但在森林土壤样品中RNP并非始终存在。但是,在除去乙炔后的12到30小时的滞后后,开始放牧,耕种和休耕土壤RNP。细菌蛋白质合成抑制剂卡那霉素(800μg/ ml)完全防止了土壤RNP的产生,而卡那霉素加庆大霉素(每种800μg/ ml)的结合只能部分防止休耕土壤的RNP(60%)。牧场土壤RNP对卡那霉素,庆大霉素或两者的组合完全不敏感。与耕种土壤不同,牧场和休耕土壤RNP分别在30°C和40°C时发生,并且没有补充NH4 +(溶液中≤10μMNH4 +),并且牧场土壤RNP对100μM烯丙基硫脲(ATU)表现出约50%的不敏感性。此外,休耕和牧草的土壤RNP对真菌抑制剂制霉菌素和嘧菌酯不敏感。这些特性的组合表明,真菌和AOB都不对牧场土壤的RNP起作用,而AOA却对牧场土壤的RNP负责。耕作土壤中的ANP和AOA均可能影响RNP,而耕作土壤中的RNP以AOB为主。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号